They do look better smaller don't they. But I do love the little double chin in that last one - he is entirely looking his age there - but still totally edible.
I'm just not a big fan of the whole giganto-sized hi-res pics in general. Every so often you get one that looks great, but for the most part, is it really necessary to count how many pores or nose hairs a celeb has? :)
But on the lighter side of things, he is looking just fabulous. (Though again, I still wish the hair were a bit longer!) ;)
I'd like to know what the photog/magazine editor were thinking when they published those shots. Did they want to go out of their way to print unflattering pixs? Would you want a horrible angled, double chinned jowly shot of yourself in a national magazine? I doubt Viggo cares but from strictly an editors POV, it's just awful. And I agree, all I get from those monster hi rez shots are an indication of the amount of sun damage he's sustained on his face. Between that, his crazy schedule and the considerable smoking/drinking he indulges in, he's aged considerably in the last five years. All the mate drinking on earth won't change that. On the other hand, his good bones are permanent.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2006-03-26 11:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-26 11:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-26 12:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-26 01:12 pm (UTC)But on the lighter side of things, he is looking just fabulous. (Though again, I still wish the hair were a bit longer!) ;)
no subject
Date: 2006-03-26 08:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-26 01:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-26 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-26 04:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-26 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-26 08:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-26 08:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-26 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-26 08:56 pm (UTC)(don't think it's been translated)
no subject
Date: 2006-03-27 04:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-26 03:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-26 08:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-26 04:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-26 04:26 pm (UTC)The photos do look better smaller.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-26 06:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-26 08:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-26 08:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-26 09:50 pm (UTC)